New clinical trial to test novel approach to treat triple-negative breast cancer

ScienceDaily (June 2, 2011) — A multicenter clinical trial led by a researcher at the University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center will evaluate a new approach to treat triple-negative breast cancer, an often-aggressive type of cancer that is more common among African-Americans and young women. The study will help researchers determine if an experimental drug, entinostat, can reprogram tumor cells to express a protein called an estrogen receptor to make them sensitive to hormone therapy.

See Also:Health & MedicineBreast CancerCancerLung CancerColon CancerProstate CancerBrain TumorReferenceMetastasisBreast cancerTumor suppressor geneHormone replacement therapy

Saranya Chumsri, M.D., an oncologist at the Greenebaum Cancer Center and assistant professor of medicine at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, is the principal investigator of the newly opened National Cancer Institute-funded study. The trial is based on laboratory studies by Angela H. Brodie, Ph.D., an internationally recognized University of Maryland breast cancer researcher, and her colleagues. Their research, recently published in the journal Cancer Research, found that entinostat can cause triple-negative breast cancer cells to become sensitive to a hormone therapy such as an aromatase inhibitor. Dr. Brodie pioneered the development of aromatase inhibitors, a class of breast cancer drugs that reduces the level of estrogen produced by the body, thereby cutting off the fuel to cancer cells.

In this Phase II trial, doctors will treat newly diagnosed postmenopausal patients with entinostat and an aromatase inhibitor called anastrozole (Arimidex) before they have surgery to remove their cancer. Researchers will analyze tissue from the tumor and blood samples to evaluate whether the treatment is effective. After surgery, patients will receive standard treatment, such as chemotherapy and radiation.

"We hope that entinostat will make the tumor cells more sensitive to the drug anastrozole, causing the tumor to shrink or, at the very least, stop growing," Dr. Chumsri says. "For patients with triple-negative breast cancer, chemotherapy is currently the only drug treatment option, and it has a lot of side effects compared to hormone therapies like anastrozole."

Triple-negative breast cancer is unique in that it lacks three common receptors in the cell -- estrogen, progesterone or human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), which are the targets of drugs widely used today to treat breast cancer. As a result, this cancer can be very difficult to treat; it doesn't respond to therapies that target estrogen and progesterone receptors, such as tamoxifen (Nolvadex), fulvestrant (Faslodex) and aromatase inhibitors (Femara, Arimidex and Aromasin), or to HER2-targeted therapies such as trastuzumab (Herceptin) and lapatinib (Tykerb).

About 15 to 20 percent of breast cancers are triple-negative. For unknown reasons, there is a higher prevalence of this type of breast cancer among African-Americans, young women and women with the BRCA1 gene mutation. African-American women are twice as likely as white women to have this type of cancer, which can be very aggressive and spread to other parts of the body, such as the lungs, liver and brain.

The clinical trial is based on laboratory studies by Dr. Brodie, a professor of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, and Gauri J. Sabnis, Ph.D., an assistant professor of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, in collaboration with Saraswati Sukumar, M.S., Ph.D., a professor of oncology and pathology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Their research showed that entinostat can sensitize triple-negative breast cancer cells to treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, and when combined with an aromatase inhibitor, also reduce the growth and spread of tumors in animal models.

"Adding to her long list of remarkable achievements, Dr. Brodie has continued her research into aromatase inhibitors, searching for ways to overcome tumors' resistance to treatment," says E. Albert Reece, M.D., Ph.D., M.B.A., vice president of medical affairs at the University of Maryland and dean of the University of Maryland School of Medicine. "This multicenter clinical trial led by Dr. Saranya Chumsri is an excellent example of how our scientists turn discoveries made in the lab into new treatments that may benefit patients."

Entinostat is an oral, selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor. This anti-cancer agent is being developed by Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and is being investigated in other clinical studies for the treatment of advanced estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, advanced colorectal cancer and Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Triple-negative breast cancer patients in this clinical trial will take entinostat weekly and anastrozole once daily for two to four weeks while they are waiting to have surgery. Researchers will use blood tests and tissue analysis of tumors to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination therapy.

Researchers hope to enroll a total of 41 patients at 20 sites, including the University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center. The centers involved in the study are affiliated with the University of Chicago Phase II study research consortium and the California Cancer Consortium.

Dr. Chumsri says that if the results of this trial are positive, researchers plan to launch a larger study to test the combination therapy on women whose cancer has metastasized to other parts of the body. "These women have limited treatment options. Hopefully, this treatment would give them a longer period in which their cancer is not progressing, with only minimal side effects compared to chemotherapy," she says.

Email or share this story:

Improving health assessments with a single cell: Portable microchip for immune monitoring and clinical applications

ScienceDaily (May 23, 2011) — There's a wealth of health information hiding in the human immune system. Accessing it, however, can be very challenging, as the many and complex roles that the immune system plays can mask the critical information that is relevant to addressing specific health issues. Now, research led by scientists from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) has shown that a new generation of microchips developed by the team can quickly and inexpensively assess immune function by examining biomarkers -- proteins that can reflect the response of the immune system to disease -- from single cells.

See Also:Health & MedicineImmune SystemLymphomaPlants & AnimalsBiologyCell BiologyMatter & EnergyMedical TechnologyBiochemistryReferenceHeat shock proteinNanomedicineNatural killer cellEmbryonic stem cell

The scientists reported on their advanced technology in the May 22 online issue of Nature Medicine.

"The technology permits us for the first time to quantitatively measure the levels of many functional proteins from single, rare immune cells," says James Heath, the Elizabeth W. Gilloon Professor and professor of chemistry at Caltech and corresponding author of the study. "The functional proteins are the ones that are secreted by the cells, and they control biological processes such as cell replication and inflammation and, specific to our study, tumor killing."

In 2008, Heath -- an expert in molecular electronics and personalized medicine -- led the development of a "barcode chip" that, using just a pinprick's worth of blood, could measure the concentrations of dozens of proteins, including those that herald the presence of diseases like cancer and heart disease. This latest single-cell barcode chip (SCBC) device builds upon the success of that initial design, which is currently being utilized in diagnostic medical testing of certain cancer patients.

The researchers tested the chip by measuring a cancer patient's response to a type of cell-based immunotherapy designed to target and kill tumor cells. The only way to know if the therapy is doing its job is to measure many proteins at the same time from the individual cells that were targeting the tumor. The SCBC aced this test, generating readouts of a dozen secreted biomarkers -- each of which represented a distinct cell function -- and taking those readings from about a thousand single cells simultaneously.

The team was able to conduct a proof-of-concept study by looking at samples from a melanoma patient participating in the immunotherapy trials, and comparing those results to similar samples from three healthy subjects.

"This technology has the potential to be used routinely to monitor immune system performance," says Chao Ma, a graduate student in Heath's lab at Caltech's NanoSystems Biology Cancer Center and lead author of the Nature Medicine paper. "For example, it can be directly used to evaluate the effectiveness of certain classes of therapeutics, such as vaccines and other immunotherapies."

According to Ma, the technology is minimally invasive, cost-effective, and highly informative. The goal, he says, is to help physicians closely track the effectiveness of a therapy, and to rapidly alter or switch that therapy for the maximum benefit of the patient.

"The research fully demonstrates real-life clinical use of our revolutionary technology," Ma says.

The next step for the team will be to systematically apply the technology to clinical studies. The researchers have already begun to test the technology in additional patient populations, and to combine the SCBC with existing assays in order to get a more comprehensive picture of a therapy's efficacy.

In fact, the same study that showed the microchip's efficacy is already helping the researchers better evaluate the specific cancer immunotherapy trial, from which the patient in the study was drawn. "We are doing these same types of measurements on similar patients but at a significantly higher level of detail, and at many time points over the course of the cancer immunotherapy procedure," explains Heath. "It is helping us put together a 'movie' of the patient's immune system during the therapy, and it is providing us with some very surprising but also valuable insights into how the therapy works and how we might work with our UCLA colleagues to improve it."

"Application of this technology provides an unprecedented understanding of the human immune system by allowing an efficient and multiplexed functional readout of immune responses using limiting numbers of lymphocytes," says Antoni Ribas, associate professor of medicine and physician who led the clinical trial portion of the study at UCLA's Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center.

The other Caltech authors of the Nature Medicine paper, "A clinical microchip for evaluation of single immune cells reveals high functional heterogeneity in phenotypically similar T cells," are postdoctoral scholar Qihui Shi; Rong Fan, former postdoctoral scholar; former graduate students Habib Ahmad and Gabriel Kwong; and Chao-Chao Liu, former undergraduate student. Begonya Comin-Andiux, assistant professor of surgery; Thinle Chodon, assistant researcher of medicine; Richard C. Koya, assistant professor of surgery; and Caius G. Radu, associate professor of medical and molecular pharmacology from UCLA's Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center also contributed to the study.

The work was funded by the National Cancer Institute, the Ivy Foundation, the Jean Perkins Foundation, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, the Caltech/UCLA Joint Center for Translational Medicine, the Melanoma Research Alliance, and the National Institutes of Health.

Email or share this story:

New treatment regimen shows clinical benefit in advanced colon cancer

ScienceDaily (May 21, 2011) — A new treatment regimen for patients with metastatic colon cancer appears to offer clinical benefit even when used after multiple other treatments have failed, say research physicians at Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, a part of Georgetown University Medical Center.

See Also:Health & MedicineBreast CancerColon CancerLung CancerCancerOvarian CancerLeukemiaReferenceMetastasisTumor suppressor geneTumorGlioma

The research team found that combining a PARP inhibitor with chemotherapy (temozolomide) offers significant benefit in patients who had no further treatment options. However, the study is small, and does not include a comparison arm, so further investigation is needed, they add. The study will be presented in an oral session on Saturday, June 4th, at the 2011 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology in Chicago.

PARP, short for "poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase" is a key part of a cell's DNA repair apparatus, and is important for protecting our normal cells against DNA damage. However, cancer cells become resistant to chemotherapy in part by increasing PARP expression and thus rapidly repairing DNA damage intentionally caused by chemotherapy. PARP inhibitors are designed to overcome a cancer cell's ability to repair the damaged DNA. (They are showing promise in both breast and ovarian cancers, and are being studied in a variety of other cancer types).

In this clinical study, doctors administered a potent DNA-damaging chemotherapy, temozolomide, with a PARP inhibitor called ABT-888. The theory is that ABT-888 will diminish the ability of these cancer cells to fix the damage that was just inflicted by the temozolomide, pushing the cancer into a death spiral.

"This is a classic one-two punch: the chemotherapy damages the cancer cells and the PARP inhibitor prevents it from fixing itself, leaving the cell to die," says lead author, Michael Pishvaian, M.D., Ph.D., an assistant professor at Georgetown Lombardi.

This single-arm, phase II study enrolled 49 patients with metastatic disease who were not eligible for surgery and had exhausted all of the standard therapies currently used. Despite having advanced cancer, all study participants were still active at work or home. Researchers found the drug combination controlled cancer growth for nearly six months in 23 percent of the patients, with two patients having a significant reduction in their tumor burden (partial response).

Pishvaian explains, "The treatment was extremely well tolerated, so to have a period of six months with no tumor growth, but also no significant side effects was really meaningful for the patients."

In addition, researchers were able to collect samples of the patients' tumors for further molecular analysis. "By testing tissue samples and identifying their molecular fingerprints, perhaps we can identify which patient subgroups are most likely to respond to this new therapeutic combination," concludes Pishvaian.

Email or share this story:

Results of international Phase III clinical trial for newly diagnosed brain tumors announced

ScienceDaily (May 18, 2011) — RTOG reports on the largest trial to-date for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma demonstrating the importance and feasibility of prospective molecular analysis of tumor tissue although finding that patients received no additional benefit from dose-intensive temozolomide as compared to standard adjuvant temozolomide after combined temozolomide and radiotherapy. The integration of tumor analysis with the clinical trial and international collaboration, major components of this unprecedented study, will significantly impact future trial design, ultimately leading to advances in patient care.

See Also:Health & MedicineBrain TumorDiseases and ConditionsColon CancerMind & BrainMental HealthDepressionStrokeReferenceClinical trialGliomaCOX-2 inhibitorHepatocellular carcinoma

In the randomized trial, RTOG 0525 Phase III Trial Comparing Conventional Adjuvant Temozolomide with Dose-Intensive Temozolomide in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma, no significant improvement in overall patient survival or disease progression was observed for patients who received the dose-intensive (dose-dense) TMZ plus radiotherapy as compared to patients who received standard-dose TMZ plus radiotherapy. The trial did however prove the feasibility of collecting and analyzing tumor tissue prospectively in a multi-center setting.. The international trial was led by RTOG principal investigator Mark R. Gilbert, MD (University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston) and conducted in concert with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG).

Four presentations will report study results at the 2011 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, June 3-7.

"Given the promising preliminary data of improved patient outcomes using an adjuvant dose-intensive schedule of temozolomide, the trial allowed us to robustly test whether this treatment strategy provides a significant benefit over standard-dose temozolomide treatment," says Gilbert. "While dose-dense temozolomide did not demonstrate improved efficacy for patients newly diagnosed with a glioblastoma, the study results confirmed the prognostic significance of MGMT gene methylation and demonstrated the feasibility of prospective tumor tissue collection, molecular stratification and collection of patient outcomes in a large transatlantic intergroup trial."

One hundred and eighty-five facilities in North America and 24 facilities in Europe enrolled 1173 study participants. Key study eligibility criteria required that tumor tissue, obtained at the time of biopsy or surgery and with patient consent, be sent for central pathology review to confirm the tumor as a glioblastoma and as adequate to perform MGMT gene methylation analysis and molecular risk classification (to assess whether a correlation exists between these biomarkers and study participant outcomes).

Upon pathology confirmation, eligible patients were enrolled in the trial and randomized into one of two adjuvant treatment arms: Arm 1 (standard arm: TMZ days 1-5 every 28 days for up to 12 cycles/months) or Arm 2 (experimental arm: TMZ days 1-21 every 28 days for up to 12 cycles/months).

Study participants were stratified to assess correlation of their outcome with three major criteria: (1) prognostic recursive partitioning (based upon age, performance status, extent of pretreatment surgery, neurologic function and mental status), (2) MGMT status (methylated, unmethylated, or indeterminate) and (3) radiation therapy treatment (US standard vs European).

Trial co-chair for neuropathology and correlative biology Kenneth D. Aldape, MD (M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston), comments, "In this trial we've demonstrated the positive correlation between clinical outcomes and molecular classification of glioblastoma, which will enable improved future prognostic prediction, spur the development of specific therapies based on tumor biology, and ultimately lead to individualization of treatment." Aldape will present findings of the tumor tissue profiling at the 2011 ASCO Annual Meeting.

"This trial was a tremendous undertaking with the complexities of confirming the presence of the MGMT gene as an eligibility criteria -- the first time a molecular marker has been used in this manner -- and of conducting the trial internationally," says RTOG Group Chair Walter J. Curran, MD, FACR,(Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta). "The collaboration with EORTC and NCCTG significantly helped to expedite trial enrollment and consequentially to expediently report trial results."

The clinical trial also included longitudinal data collection to measure neurocognitive function, symptom burden and health-related quality of life, collectively called net clinical benefits. The important correlations of these measures with outcomes shown by the trial will also be reported at the ASCO meeting, along with seven presentations regarding other RTOG trials.

RTOG 0525 was supported by Award Number U10CA021661 from the National Cancer Institute. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health. RTOG also received support from Merck to conduct this trial.

Email or share this story: